🔗 Share this article

The revolution may not be broadcast, yet it might possess webbed feet and protruding eyes.

Additionally, it could include a unicorn's horn or the plumage of a chicken.

Whilst protests against the government persist in American cities, participants have embraced the energy of a local block party. They've offered dance instruction, handed out snacks, and performed on unicycles, as police watch.

Blending humour and politics – a tactic experts term "tactical frivolity" – has historical precedent. Yet it has transformed into a signature characteristic of American protest in recent years, embraced by various groups.

One particular emblem has risen to become especially powerful – the frog. It began after recordings of a clash between a man in a frog suit and immigration enforcement agents in Portland, Oregon, spread online. It subsequently appeared to protests nationwide.

"A great deal at play with that little frog costume," states a professor, who teaches at UC Davis and an academic who focuses on creative activism.

The Path From the Pepe Meme to Portland

It is difficult to discuss demonstrations and amphibians without talking about Pepe, a cartoon character embraced by far-right groups during a political race.

As the character first took off online, people used it to signal certain emotions. Later, it was utilized to show support for a candidate, even a particular image retweeted by the candidate personally, showing the frog with recognizable attire and hairstyle.

Pepe was also depicted in certain internet forums in more extreme scenarios, portrayed as a historical dictator. Participants exchanged "unique frog images" and established digital currency using its likeness. His catchphrase, "that feels good", was deployed an inside joke.

Yet Pepe didn't start out this divisive.

Matt Furie, artist Matt Furie, has been vocal about his disapproval for its appropriation. His creation was meant as simply a relaxed amphibian in this artist's universe.

This character debuted in a series of comics in the mid-2000s – non-political and notable for a particular bathroom habit. In a documentary, which chronicles the creator's attempt to reclaim ownership of his work, he stated the character came from his experiences with friends and roommates.

As he started out, Mr Furie experimented with sharing his art to early internet platforms, where people online began to copy, alter, and reinterpret his character. As its popularity grew into fringe areas of online spaces, the creator tried to disavow the frog, including ending its life in a comic strip.

But Pepe lived on.

"This demonstrates that creators cannot own symbols," explains Prof Bogad. "They can change and shift and be reworked."

Until recently, the association of Pepe resulted in frogs were predominantly linked to conservative politics. But that changed in early October, when an incident between a protestor dressed in a blow-up amphibian suit and an immigration officer in Portland captured global attention.

The event followed a directive to send military personnel to Portland, which was described as "a warzone". Activists began to congregate outside a facility, near an immigration enforcement facility.

The situation was tense and an agent sprayed irritant at the individual, aiming directly into the air intake fan of the inflatable suit.

Seth Todd, the man in the costume, reacted humorously, saying he had tasted "spicier tamales". But the incident became a sensation.

The frog suit was somewhat typical for Portland, renowned for its unconventional spirit and activist demonstrations that delight in the ridiculous – public yoga, retro fitness classes, and nude cycling groups. A local saying is "Keep Portland Weird."

This symbol was also referenced in subsequent court proceedings between the administration and Portland, which argued the deployment was unlawful.

While a ruling was issued in October that the administration was within its rights to send personnel, one judge dissented, mentioning demonstrators' "well-known penchant for wearing chicken suits while voicing opposition."

"It is easy to see this decision, which adopts the government's characterization as a war zone, as merely absurd," Judge Susan Graber wrote. "Yet the outcome goes beyond absurdity."

The order was stopped legally soon after, and troops have reportedly departed the area.

However, by that time, the frog had transformed into a significant anti-administration symbol for the left.

This symbol was seen across the country at anti-authoritarian protests last autumn. Amphibian costumes were present – and unicorns and axolotls and dinosaurs – in San Diego and Atlanta and Boston. They appeared in rural communities and global metropolises like Tokyo and London.

The frog costume was sold out on major websites, and rose in price.

Mastering the Visual Story

What connects the two amphibian symbols – is the relationship between the silly, innocent image and a deeper political meaning. This is what "tactical frivolity."

The strategy is based on what the professor calls the "irresistible image" – usually humorous, it acts as a "appealing and non-threatening" display that calls attention to a cause without explicitly stating them. It's the unusual prop used, or the symbol circulated.

The professor is both an expert on this topic and a veteran practitioner. He's written a text on the subject, and taught workshops internationally.

"One can look back to historical periods – under oppressive regimes, absurd humor is used to express dissent a little bit and still have plausible deniability."

The purpose of such tactics is three-fold, he says.

When activists confront a powerful opposition, a silly costume {takes control of|seizes|influences