🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed seats for Indigenous council members on New Zealand local authorities is set to be cut by more than half, following a controversial law change that required local governments to submit the future of hard-earned Māori seats to a public vote.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have one or more councillors depending on demographic data, were established in 2001 to give Māori electors the choice to vote for a guaranteed Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, local governments were only able to create a Indigenous seat by initially putting it to a public vote in their region. Communities frequently spent years generating community backing and urging their local governments to establish Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government allowed municipal authorities to establish a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to put it to a public vote.

However, this year, the current administration reversed the change, stating local residents should decide whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Referendum Results

The new legislation required local authorities that had established a ward under the previous policy to hold decisive public votes concurrently with the local body elections, which ended on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the referendum, 17 decided to keep their wards, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – revealing many regions opposed to reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes provided “a vital step in restoring local democratic control.”

Critics however have condemned the new policy as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the current administration has implemented extensive reversals to measures intended to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has said it aims to terminate “race-based” policies, and says it is dedicated to enhancing results for Māori and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the public votes were divided down urban-rural lines – six of the seven cities required to vote backed Māori wards, while rural regions leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

This year’s municipal polls registered the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with under one-third of citizens casting a vote, leading to calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Councils are able to create different wards – including rural wards – without initially mandating a community ballot. The disparate requirements placed on Māori wards indicated the government was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark referred to the 17 regions that voted to keep their seats.